The "Everything as Code" Paradigm

What it means to treat everything as version-controlled, executable artifacts

What "Everything as Code" Means

"Everything as Code" is the practice of representing all aspects of your system lifecycle as version-controlled, executable, machine-readable artifacts.

Not Just Infrastructure

Most teams are familiar with:

• Infrastructure as Code - Terraform, CloudFormation, Ansible
• Configuration as Code - YAML, JSON, environment variables

But "Everything as Code" extends much further:

• Specifications as Code - Requirements that execute as automated tests
• Documentation as Code - Living docs generated from code and specifications
• Compliance as Code - Regulatory requirements enforced automatically
• Policy as Code - Governance rules that run in CI/CD pipelines
• Architecture as Code - Design decisions captured in executable form

The Core Principle

If it can be represented as text, it can be versioned. If it can be versioned, it can be reviewed. If it can be reviewed, it can be tested. If it can be tested, it can be automated.

The Three Fundamental Changes

"Everything as Code" creates three fundamental changes in how teams work:

Single Timeline for Traceability

Traditional Approach: Multiple Disconnected Systems

Problems:

• Six different systems with six different timelines
• Manual correlation required
• Version mismatches inevitable
• Traceability reconstructed retroactively
• Audit trail compilation takes weeks

Everything as Code Approach: Single Source of Truth

Benefits:

• All artifacts in one version control system
• Single timeline from requirement to deployment
• Automatic correlation through commits
• Cryptographic integrity (Git SHA hashes)
• Traceability exists in real-time
• Audit trail always available

Building Shared Language: Domain-Driven Design

Before teams can collaborate through executable specifications, they need a shared language—a common vocabulary that both business stakeholders and developers understand.

The challenge: Business and technical teams often speak different languages:

• Business: "The customer's order is fulfilled"
• Technical: "The transaction state transitions to complete"

This misalignment causes:

• Specifications that don't reflect business intent
• Rework when teams discover they meant different things
• Tests that pass but don't validate actual business rules

The solution: Domain-Driven Design (DDD) provides techniques for building a Ubiquitous Language—a rigorous, shared vocabulary based on the domain model.

How it works:

1. Event Storming - Collaborative domain discovery surfaces shared vocabulary
2. Example Mapping - Uses that vocabulary to define requirements
3. Executable Specifications - Written using the same language, ensuring alignment

When specifications use the Ubiquitous Language:

• Business stakeholders can read and validate them
• Developers implement exactly what the business means
• QA tests reflect actual business rules
• Living documentation uses terms everyone understands

For more on building shared language for specifications, see:

• Ubiquitous Language - DDD foundation
• Event Storming - Domain discovery workshops

Collaboration Through Executable Specifications

Traditional Approach: Telephone Game

Problems:

• Three different mental models
• Inevitable misalignment
• "Not what I meant" feedback loops
• Ambiguous requirements
• Test cases don't match intent

Everything as Code Approach: Shared Language + Executable Specifications

Benefits:

• Single shared language (Gherkin)
• Readable by all stakeholders
• Executable by automation
• Significantly reduces drift from implementation
• Immediate feedback on misunderstanding

In this project:

• All stakeholders collaborate on a single specification.feature file using Gherkin
• File contains Feature → Rule → Scenario structure
• Rules define acceptance criteria
• Scenarios under Rules provide concrete examples
• Specifications execute as automated tests, ensuring alignment
• When tests pass, requirements are met by definition
• Business-readable language bridges stakeholder communication

Continuous Automation With Every Change

Traditional Approach: Manual Gates

Problems:

• Validation delayed until late
• Manual steps can be skipped
• Inconsistent execution
• Batch processing creates risk
• Bottlenecks slow delivery

Everything as Code Approach: Automated Pipeline

Benefits:

• Build automatically on every commit
• Test automatically with every build
• Validate compliance in pipeline
• Deploy automatically when tests pass
• Document automatically from code/tests
• Every change is validated identically
• Feedback in minutes, not weeks

The Value Proposition

Key Principles

"Everything as Code" operates on several key principles:

Version Everything

If it matters, version it:

• Requirements and specifications
• Source code (obviously)
• Tests at all levels
• Infrastructure definitions
• Configuration
• Documentation
• Architecture decisions
• Compliance policies
• Deployment scripts

Make It Executable

Passive documents drift. Executable artifacts stay current:

• Specifications run as tests
• Architecture diagrams generated from code
• Documentation built from source
• Policies enforced in pipelines

Automate Validation

Humans forget. Automation is consistent:

• Every commit triggers validation
• Tests run identically every time
• No manual steps in critical path
• Failure stops progression

Capture Evidence Continuously

Don't reconstruct—capture as you go:

• Version control is audit trail
• Test results are compliance evidence
• Build artifacts are reproducible
• Documentation auto-generated

Single Source of Truth

Duplication causes drift:

• One repository for related artifacts
• Generate derived artifacts from source
• Link, don't duplicate
• Git is the authority

References

• Accelerate: The Science of Lean Software and DevOps
• The DevOps Handbook
• Continuous Delivery

Tutorials | How-to Guides | Explanation | Reference

You are here: Explanation — understanding-oriented discussion that clarifies concepts.