The "Everything as Code" Paradigm

What it means to treat everything as version-controlled, executable artifacts

What "Everything as Code" Means

"Everything as Code" is the practice of representing all aspects of your system lifecycle as version-controlled, executable, machine-readable artifacts.

Not Just Infrastructure

Most teams are familiar with:

• Infrastructure as Code - Terraform, CloudFormation, Ansible
• Configuration as Code - YAML, JSON, environment variables

But "Everything as Code" extends much further:

• Specifications as Code - Requirements that execute as automated tests
• Documentation as Code - Living docs generated from code and specifications
• Compliance as Code - Regulatory requirements enforced automatically
• Policy as Code - Governance rules that run in CI/CD pipelines
• Architecture as Code - Design decisions captured in executable form

The Core Principle

• If it can be represented as text, it can be versioned.
• If it can be versioned, it can be reviewed.
• If it can be reviewed, it can be tested.
• -If it can be tested, it can be automated.

The Three Fundamental Changes

"Everything as Code" creates three fundamental changes in how teams work:

Single Timeline for Traceability

Traditional Approach: Multiple Disconnected Systems

Problems:

• Six different systems with six different timelines
• Manual correlation required
• Version mismatches inevitable
• Traceability reconstructed retroactively
• Audit trail compilation takes weeks

Everything as Code Approach: Single Source of Truth

Benefits:

• All artifacts in one version control system
• Single timeline from requirement to deployment
• Automatic correlation through commits
• Cryptographic integrity (Git SHA hashes)
• Traceability exists in real-time
• Audit trail always available

Building Shared Language: Domain-Driven Design

Before teams can collaborate through executable specifications, they need a shared language — a common vocabulary that both business stakeholders and developers understand.

The challenge: Business and technical teams often speak different languages:

• Business: "The customer's order is fulfilled"
• Technical: "The transaction state transitions to complete"

This misalignment causes:

• Specifications that don't reflect business intent
• Rework when teams discover they meant different things
• Tests that pass but don't validate actual business rules

The solution: Domain-Driven Design (DDD) provides techniques for building a Ubiquitous Language — a rigorous, shared vocabulary based on the domain model.

How it works:

1. Event Storming - Collaborative domain discovery surfaces shared vocabulary
2. Example Mapping - Uses that vocabulary to define requirements
3. Executable Specifications - Written using the same language, ensuring alignment

When specifications use the Ubiquitous Language:

• Business stakeholders can read and validate them
• Developers implement exactly what the business means
• QA tests reflect actual business rules
• Living documentation uses terms everyone understands

For more on building shared language for specifications, see:

• Ubiquitous Language - DDD foundation
• Event Storming - Domain discovery workshops

Collaboration Through Executable Specifications

Traditional Approach: Telephone Game

Problems:

• Three different mental models
• Inevitable misalignment
• "Not what I meant" feedback loops
• Ambiguous requirements
• Test cases don't match intent

Everything as Code Approach: Shared Language + Executable Specifications

Benefits:

• Single shared language (Gherkin)
• Readable by all stakeholders
• Executable by automation
• Significantly reduces drift from implementation
• Immediate feedback on misunderstanding

In this project:

• All stakeholders collaborate on a single specification.feature file using Gherkin
• File contains Feature → Rule → Scenario structure
• Rules define acceptance criteria
• Scenarios under Rules provide concrete examples
• Specifications execute as automated tests, ensuring alignment
• When tests pass, requirements are met by definition
• Business-readable language bridges stakeholder communication

Continuous Automation With Every Change

Traditional Approach: Manual Gates

Problems:

• Validation delayed until late
• Manual steps can be skipped
• Inconsistent execution
• Batch processing creates risk
• Bottlenecks slow delivery

Everything as Code Approach: Automated Pipeline

Benefits:

• Build automatically on every commit
• Test automatically with every build
• Validate compliance in pipeline
• Deploy automatically when tests pass
• Document automatically from code/tests
• Every change is validated identically
• Feedback in minutes, not weeks

The Value Proposition

Key Principles

"Everything as Code" operates on several key principles:

Version Everything

If it matters, version it:

• Requirements and specifications
• Source code (obviously)
• Tests at all levels
• Infrastructure definitions
• Configuration
• Documentation
• Architecture decisions
• Compliance policies
• Deployment scripts

Make It Executable

Passive documents drift. Executable artifacts stay current:

• Specifications run as tests
• Architecture diagrams generated from code
• Documentation built from source
• Policies enforced in pipelines

Automate Validation

Humans forget. Automation is consistent:

• Every commit triggers validation
• Tests run identically every time
• No manual steps in critical path
• Failure stops progression

Capture Evidence Continuously

Don't reconstruct—capture as you go:

• Version control is audit trail
• Test results are compliance evidence
• Build artifacts are reproducible
• Documentation auto-generated

Single Source of Truth

Duplication causes drift:

• One repository for related artifacts
• Generate derived artifacts from source
• Link, don't duplicate
• Git is the authority

References

• Accelerate: The Science of Lean Software and DevOps
• The DevOps Handbook
• Continuous Delivery

Tutorials | How-to Guides | Explanation | Reference

You are here: Explanation — understanding-oriented discussion that clarifies concepts.